Note: You are probably reading this message because you do not have a standards-compliant browser. Please Read the design and accessibility statement for more information.

Contents

Skip to Main Content

Case Study 9 - Rehabilitation, Energy, Tenant Choice and Participation

James Nisbet Street Housing Co-operative, James Nisbet Street Phases 1-3, Glasgow

Case Study Information
Type: Rehabilitation, tenement flats, 4 storey      
Number of units: Phase 1 45
Phase 2 56
Phase 3 44
     
SAP rating: n/a      
U-values: 0.2 Wm2C roof
0.42 Wm2C walls
floor n/a

     
Fuel costs: £7.75 pw (predicted)
     
Works costs: Phase 1: £1,352,000 Phase 2: £1,840,000 Phase 3 £1,702,000  
Unit cost: £30,000      
Completion date: Phase 1: 1991 Phase 2: 1992 Phase 3: 1994  
Contacts Client: James Nisbet Housing Co-operative Laurence.O.Boyle 0141 552 7928
  Architect: Assist Architects Andy Jack 0131 555 5700
  Builder: Tarmac Construction    

In 1989, James Nisbet Street Co-operative inherited 200 tenement dwellings built by Glasgow City Council in the 1960's. The housing is part of a large estate to the north of the city centre on a relatively exposed south-facing hillside. Amenities within the local area are basic but there are some public transport links. Car parking is well below planning guidelines. A decision was taken to rehabilitate all the stock, exploiting passive solar gain where possible and adapting layouts to form a more suitable housing mix.

 (click to enlarge)

Figure 9.1 Solar sunspaces offer a "thermal buffer" zone to the main flats.

Key Features

Energy

Balcony sunspaces, reduced north windows, condensing boilers, overcladding

Wall insulation: 50mm Rockwool
Loft insulation: 150mm Glass fibre
Sunspaces: in Phases 2 and 3, 1200mm deep south and west facing balconies have been glazed in to make very cost effective sunspaces. Thermal mass is provided by the existing balcony structure. They are vented into the living space, and pre-warmed air is casually dragged through the dwelling by means of humidistat fans in the north-facing service spaces. In Phases 1 and 2 oversized north facing windows were reduced to save heat loss. Condensing boilers were used in Phases 2 and 3. Overcladding insulation has prevented cold bridging.

Social and Management

Tenant choice and participation

A major aspect of the rehabilitation work was the close relationship formed by the housing management team and architects with the existing tenants. As a result tenants have a strong sense of "owning" the area and property they live in.

Tenant Choice: an initial social survey was carried out to find out tenant requirements and aspirations and a new housing mix designed to accommodate these. Every household was interviewed individually by the architects using models and plans and offered choices on the following:

A recent tenant survey showed 98% satisfaction with the accommodation.

Tenant Participation: a strong tenants. committee met fortnightly with the design team to progress design ideas. Meetings were also arranged with groups of tenants from each communal close to determine communal finishes.

Other Relevant Aspects

The Site

 (click to enlarge)

Figure 9.4 Phase 1 allowed tenants to cultivate their own gardens for the first time and provided good sheltering at ground level.

Biodiversity, modification of micro-climate

Indigenous trees and planting reinforced by fencing and low walls have helped to create good wind drag around the site and partially protected entrances. Private garden areas were created at ground level to encourage tenants to maintain the landscaping.

Healthy Dwellings

Sustainable and non-toxic materials

An environmental specification which sourced sustainable and non-toxic materials included the following:

 
 (click to enlarge)

Figure 9.2 The flats before conversion in phases 2 and 3.

 (click to enlarge)

Figure 9.3 The flats after conversion showing infilled balconies to create sunspaces.

Costs and Maintenance

There have been some problems obtaining adequate servicing for the condensing boilers and high maintenance costs associated with having to re-paint the external overcladding every few years. Costs were within Scottish Homes standard cost yardsticks. 90% HAG funding was obtained.