| |
Contents Previous
Next
|
Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction - The Assessment of the British
Government
CHAPTER 3
THE
CURRENT POSITION: 19982002
- This chapter sets out what we know of Saddam Hussein's chemical,
biological, nuclear and ballistic missile programmes, drawing
on all the available evidence. While it takes account of the results
from UN inspections and other publicly available information,
it also draws heavily on the latest intelligence about Iraqi efforts
to develop their programmes and capabilities since 1998. The main
conclusions are that:
-
Iraq has a useable chemical and biological
weapons capability, in breach of UNSCR 687, which has included
recent production of chemical and biological agents;
-
Saddam continues to attach great
importance to the possession of weapons of mass destruction and
ballistic missiles which he regards as being the basis for Iraq's
regional power. He is determined to retain these capabilities;
- Iraq can deliver chemical and biological agents using an extensive
range of artillery shells, free-fall bombs, sprayers and ballistic
missiles;
- Iraq continues to work on developing nuclear weapons, in breach
of its obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty and in breach
of UNSCR 687. Uranium has been sought from Africa that has no civil
nuclear application in Iraq;
- Iraq possesses extended-range versions of the SCUD ballistic missile
in breach of UNSCR 687 which are capable of reaching Cyprus, Eastern
Turkey, Tehran and Israel. It is also developing longer-range ballistic
missiles;
- Iraq's current military planning specifically envisages the use
of chemical and biological weapons;
- Iraq's military forces are able to use chemical and biological weapons,
with command, control and logistical arrangements in place. The Iraqi
military are able to deploy these weapons within 45 minutes of a decision
to do so;
- Iraq has learnt lessons from previous UN weapons inspections and
is already taking steps to conceal and disperse sensitive equipment
and documentation in advance of the return of inspectors;
- Iraq's chemical, biological, nuclear and ballistic missiles programmes
are well-funded.
CHEMICAL
AND BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS
Joint Intelligence
Committee (JIC) Assessment: 19992002
- Since the withdrawal of the inspectors the JIC has monitored
evidence, including from secret intelligence, of continuing work
on Iraqi offensive chemical and biological warfare capabilities.
In the first half of 2000 the JIC noted intelligence on Iraqi
attempts to procure dual-use chemicals and on the reconstruction
of civil chemical production at sites formerly associated with
the chemical warfare programme. Iraq had also been trying to procure
dual-use materials and equipment which could be used for a biological
warfare programme. Personnel known to have been connected to the
biological warfare programme up to the Gulf War had been conducting
research into pathogens. There was intelligence that Iraq was starting to produce
biological warfare agents in mobile production facilities. Planning
for the project had begun in 1995 under Dr Rihab Taha, known to
have been a central player in the pre-Gulf War programme. The
JIC concluded that Iraq had sufficient expertise, equipment and material to produce biological warfare agents within weeks using its legitimate bio-technology facilities.
- In mid-2001 the JIC assessed that Iraq retained some chemical
warfare agents, precursors, production equipment and weapons from
before the Gulf War.
These stocks would enable Iraq to produce significant quantities
of mustard gas within weeks and of nerve agent within months.
The JIC concluded that intelligence on Iraqi former chemical and
biological warfare facilities, their limited reconstruction and
civil production pointed to a continuing research and development
programme. These chemical and biological capabilities represented
the most immediate threat from Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.
Since 1998 Iraqi development of mass destruction weaponry had
been helped by the absence of inspectors and the increase in illegal
border trade, which was providing hard currency.
- In the last six months the JIC has confirmed its earlier judgements
on Iraqi chemical and biological warfare capabilities and assessed
that Iraq has the means to deliver chemical and biological weapons.
Recent
intelligence
- Subsequently, intelligence has become available from reliable
sources which complements and adds to previous intelligence and
confirms the JIC assessment that Iraq has chemical and biological
weapons. The intelligence also shows that the Iraqi leadership
has been discussing a number of issues related to these weapons.
This intelligence covers:
-
Confirmation
that chemical and biological weapons play an important role in
Iraqi military thinking: intelligence shows that Saddam
attaches great importance to the possession of chemical and biological
weapons which he regards as being the basis for Iraqi regional
power. He believes that respect for Iraq rests on its possession
of these weapons and the missiles capable of delivering them.
Intelligence indicates that Saddam is determined to retain this
capability and recognises that Iraqi political weight would be
diminished if Iraq's military power rested solely on its conventional
military forces.
-
Iraqi
attempts to retain its existing banned weapons systems: Iraq
is already taking steps to prevent UN weapons inspectors finding
evidence of its chemical and biological weapons programme. Intelligence
indicates that Saddam has learnt lessons from previous weapons
inspections, has identified possible weak points in the inspections
process and knows how to exploit them. Sensitive equipment and
papers can easily be concealed and in some cases this is already
happening. The possession of mobile biological agent production
facilities will also aid concealment efforts. Saddam is determined
not to lose the capabilities that he has been able to develop
further in the four years since inspectors left.
-
Saddam's
willingness to use chemical and biological weapons: intelligence
indicates that as part of Iraq's military planning Saddam is willing
to use chemical and biological weapons, including against his
own Shia population. Intelligence indicates that the Iraqi military
are able to deploy chemical or biological weapons within 45 minutes
of an order to do so.
Chemical
and biological agents: surviving stocks
- When confronted with questions about the unaccounted stocks,
Iraq has claimed repeatedly that if it had retained any chemical
agents from before the Gulf War they would have deteriorated sufficiently
to render them harmless. But Iraq has admitted to UNSCOM to having
the knowledge and capability to add stabiliser to nerve agent
and other chemical warfare agents which would prevent such decomposition.
In 1997 UNSCOM also examined some munitions which had been filled
with mustard gas prior to 1991 and found that they remained very
toxic and showed little sign of deterioration.
- Iraq has claimed that all its biological agents and weapons
have been destroyed. No convincing proof of any kind has been
produced to support this claim. In particular, Iraq could not
explain large discrepancies between the amount of growth media
(nutrients required for the specialised growth of agent) it procured
before 1991 and the amounts of agent it admits to having manufactured.
The discrepancy is enough to produce more than three times the
amount of anthrax allegedly manufactured.
Chemical
agent: production capabilities
- Intelligence shows that Iraq has continued to produce chemical
agent. During the Gulf War a number of facilities which intelligence
reporting indicated were directly or indirectly associated with
Iraq's chemical weapons effort were attacked and damaged. Following
the ceasefire UNSCOM destroyed or rendered harmless facilities
and equipment used in Iraq's chemical weapons programme. Other
equipment was released for civilian use either in industry or
academic institutes, where it was tagged and regularly inspected
and monitored, or else placed under camera monitoring, to ensure
that it was not being misused. This monitoring ceased when UNSCOM
withdrew from Iraq in 1998. However, capabilities remain and,
although the main chemical weapon production facility at al-Muthanna
was completely destroyed by UNSCOM and has not been rebuilt, other
plants formerly associated with the chemical warfare programme
have been rebuilt. These include the chlorine and phenol plant
at Fallujah 2 near Habbaniyah. In addition to their civilian uses,
chlorine and phenol are used for precursor chemicals which contribute
to the production of chemical agents.
- Other dual-use facilities, which are capable of being used to
support the production of chemical agent and precursors, have
been rebuilt and re-equipped. New chemical facilities have been
built, some with illegal foreign assistance, and are probably
fully operational or ready for production. These include the Ibn
Sina Company at Tarmiyah (see figure 1), which is a chemical research
centre. It undertakes research, development and production of
chemicals previously imported but not now available and which
are needed for Iraq's civil industry. The Director General of
the research centre is Hikmat Na'im al-Jalu who prior to the Gulf
War worked in Iraq's nuclear weapons programme and after the war
was responsible for preserving Iraq's chemical expertise.
FIGURE
1: THE IBN SINA COMPANY AT TARMIYAH
- Parts of the al-Qa'qa' chemical complex damaged in the Gulf
War have also been repaired and are operational. Of particular
concern are elements of the phosgene production plant at al-Qa'qa'.
These were severely damaged during the Gulf War, and dismantled
under UNSCOM supervision, but have since been rebuilt. While phosgene
does have industrial uses it can also be used by itself as a chemical
agent or as a precursor for nerve agent.
- Iraq has retained the expertise for chemical warfare research,
agent production and weaponisation. Most of the personnel previously
involved in the programme remain in country. While UNSCOM found
a number of technical manuals (so called "cook books") for the
production of chemical agents and critical precursors, Iraq's
claim to have unilaterally destroyed the bulk of the documentation
cannot be confirmed and is almost certainly untrue. Recent intelligence
indicates that Iraq is still discussing methods of concealing
such documentation in order to ensure that it is not discovered
by any future UN inspections.
The
Problem of Dual-Use Facilities
Almost all components and supplies used in weapons of mass
destruction and ballistic missile programmes are dual-use. For
example, any major petrochemical or biotech industry, as well
as public health organisations, will have legitimate need for
most materials and equipment required to manufacture chemical
and biological weapons. Without UN weapons inspectors it is
very difficult therefore to be sure about the true nature of
many of Iraq'a facilities.
For example, Iraq has built a lareg nw chemical complex, Project
Baiji, in the desert in north west Iraq at al-Sharqat (see figure
2). This site is a former uranium enrichment facility which
was damaged during the Gulf War and rendered harmless under
supervision of the IAEA. Part of the site has been rebuilt,
with work starting in 1992, as a chemical production complex.
Despite the site being far away from populated areas it is surrounded
by a high wall with watch towers and guarded by armed guards.
Intelligence reports indicate that it will produce nitric acid
which can be used in explosives, missile fuel and in the purification
of uranium.
FIGURE
2: AL-SHARQAT CHEMICAL PRODUCTION FACILITY
|
Biological agent: production capabilities
- We know from intelligence that Iraq has continued to produce
biological warfare agents. As with some chemical equipment, UNSCOM
only destroyed equipment that could be directly linked to biological
weapons production. Iraq also has its own engineering capability
to design and construct biological agent associated fermenters,
centrifuges, sprayer dryers and other equipment and is judged
to be self-sufficient in the technology required to produce biological
weapons. The experienced personnel who were active in the programme
have largely remained in the country. Some dual-use equipment
has also been purchased, but without monitoring by UN inspectors
Iraq could have diverted it to their biological weapons programme.
This newly purchased equipment and other equipment previously
subject to monitoring could be used in a resurgent biological
warfare programme. Facilities of concern include:
-
the Castor Oil Production Plant at
Fallujah: this was damaged in UK/US air attacks in 1998 (Operation
Desert Fox) but has been rebuilt. The residue from the castor
bean pulp can be used in the production of the biological agent
ricin;
-
the al-Dawrah Foot and Mouth Disease
Vaccine Institute: which was involved in biological agent production
and research before the Gulf War;
-
the Amariyah Sera and Vaccine Plant
at Abu Ghraib: UNSCOM established that this facility was used
to store biological agents, seed stocks and conduct biological
warfare associated genetic research prior to the Gulf War. It
has now expanded its storage capacity.
-
UNSCOM established that Iraq considered the use of mobile biological
agent production facilities. In the past two years evidence from
defectors has indicated the existence of such facilities. Recent
intelligence confirms that the Iraqi military have developed mobile
facilities. These would help Iraq conceal and protect biological
agent production from military attack or UN inspection.
Chemical and
biological agents: delivery means
-
Iraq has a
variety of delivery means
available for both chemical
and biological agents.
These include:
-
free-fall bombs: Iraq acknowledged
to UNSCOM the deployment to two sites of free-fall bombs filled
with biological agent during 199091. These bombs were filled
with anthrax, botulinum toxin and aflatoxin. Iraq also acknowledged
possession of four types of aerial bomb with various chemical
agent fills including sulphur mustard, tabun, sarin and cyclosarin;
- artillery shells and rockets: Iraq made extensive use of artillery
munitions filled with chemical agents during the Iran-Iraq War. Mortars
can also be used for chemical agent delivery. Iraq is known to have
tested the use of shells and rockets filled with biological agents.
Over 20,000 artillery munitions remain unaccounted for by UNSCOM;
- helicopter and aircraft borne sprayers: Iraq carried out studies
into aerosol dissemination of biological agent using these platforms
prior to 1991. UNSCOM was unable to account for many of these devices.
It is probable that Iraq retains a capability for aerosol dispersal
of both chemical and biological agent over a large area;
- al-Hussein ballistic missiles (range 650km): Iraq told UNSCOM that
it filled 25 warheads with anthrax, botulinum toxin and aflatoxin.
Iraq also developed chemical agent warheads for al-Hussein. Iraq admitted
to producing 50 chemical warheads for al-Hussein which were intended
for the delivery of a mixture of sarin and cyclosarin. However, technical
analysis of warhead remnants has shown traces of VX degradation product
which indicate that some additional warheads were made and filled
with VX;
- al-Samoud/Ababil-100 ballistic missiles (range 150km plus): it
is unclear if chemical and biological warheads have been developed
for these systems, but given the Iraqi experience on other missile
systems, we judge that Iraq has the technical expertise for doing
so;
- L-29 remotely piloted vehicle programme (see figure 3): we know
from intelligence that Iraq has attempted to modify the L-29 jet trainer
to allow it to be used as an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) which is
potentially capable of delivering chemical and biological agents over
a large area.
FIGURE
3: THE L-29 JET TRAINER
Chemical
and biological warfare: command and control
- The authority to use chemical and biological weapons ultimately
resides with Saddam but intelligence indicates that he may have
also delegated this authority to his son Qusai. Special Security
Organisation (SSO) and Special Republican Guard (SRG) units
would be involved in the movement of any chemical and biological
weapons to military units. The Iraqi military holds artillery
and missile systems at Corps level throughout the Armed Forces
and conducts regular training with them. The Directorate of
Rocket Forces has operational control of strategic missile systems
and some Multiple Launcher Rocket Systems.
Chemical
and biological weapons: summary
- Intelligence shows that Iraq has covert chemical and biological
weapons programmes, in breach of UN Security Council Resolution
687 and has continued to produce chemical and biological agents.
Iraq has:
- chemical and biological agents and weapons available, both from
pre-Gulf War stocks and more recent production;
- the capability to produce the chemical agents mustard gas, tabun,
sarin, cyclosarin, and VX capable of producing mass casualties;
- a biological agent production capability and can produce at
least anthrax, botulinum toxin, aflatoxin and ricin. Iraq has also
developed mobile facilities to produce biological agents;
- a variety of delivery means available;
- military forces, which maintain the capability to use these weapons
with command, control and logistical arrangements in place.
NUCLEAR
WEAPONS
Joint
Intelligence Committee (JIC) Assessments: 19992001
- Since 1999 the JIC has monitored Iraq's attempts to reconstitute
its nuclear weapons programme. In mid-2001 the JIC assessed that
Iraq had continued its nuclear research after 1998. The JIC drew
attention to intelligence that Iraq had recalled its nuclear scientists
to the programme in 1998. Since 1998 Iraq had been trying to procure
items that could be for use in the construction of centrifuges
for the enrichment of uranium.
Iraqi
nuclear weapons expertise
- Paragraphs 5 and 6 of Chapter 2 describe the Iraqi nuclear weapons
programme prior to the Gulf War. It is clear from IAEA inspections
and Iraq's own declarations that by 1991 considerable progress
had been made in both developing methods to produce fissile material
and in weapons design. The IAEA dismantled the physical infrastructure
of the Iraqi nuclear weapons
Elements
of a nuclear weapons programme: nuclear fission weapon
A typical nuclear fission weapon consists of:
- fissile material for the core which gives out huge amounts
of explosive energy from nuclear reactions when made "super
critical" through extreme compression. Fissile material
is usually either highly enriched uranium (HEU) or weapons-grade
plutonium:
HEU can be made in gas centrifuges (see separate box on
p25);
plutonium is made by reprocessing fuel from a nuclear reactor;
- explosives which are needed to compress the nuclear core.
These explosives also require a complex arrangement of detonators,
explosive charges to produce an even and rapid compression
of the core;
- sophisticated electronics to fire the explosives;
- a neutron initiator to provide initial burst of neutrons
to start the nuclear reactions.
|
|
Weaponisation
Weaponisation is the conversion of these concepts into a reliable
weapon. It includes:
- developing a weapon design through sophisticated science
and complex calculations;
- engineering design to integrate with the delivery system;
- specialised equipment to cast and machine safely the nuclear
core;
- dedicated facilities to assemble the warheads;
- facilities to rigorously test all individual components
and designs;
The complexity is much greater for a weapon that can fit
into a missile warhead than for a larger Nagasaki-type bomb.
|
programme, including the dedicated facilities and equipment for uranium
separation and enrichment, and for weapon development and production,
and removed the remaining highly enriched uranium. But Iraq retained,
and retains, many of its experienced nuclear scientists and technicians
who are specialised in the production of fissile material and weapons
design. Intelligence indicates that Iraq also retains the accompanying
programme documentation and data.
19. Intelligence shows that the present Iraqi programme
is almost certainly seeking an indigenous ability to enrich uranium
to the level needed for a nuclear weapon. It indicates that the approach
is based on gas centrifuge uranium enrichment, one of the routes Iraq
was following for producing fissile material before the Gulf War.
But Iraq needs certain key equipment, including gas centrifuge components
and components for the production of fissile material before a nuclear
bomb could be developed.
Gas centrifuge
uranium enrichment
Uranium in the form of uranium hexafluoride is separated into
its different isotopes in rapidly spinning rotor tubes of special
centrifuges. Many hundreds or thousands of centrifuges are connected
in cascades to enrich uranium. If the lighter U235 isotope is
enriched to more than 90% it can be used in the core of a nuclear
weapon. |
- Following the departure of weapons inspectors in 1998 there
has been an accumulation of intelligence indicating that Iraq
is making concerted covert efforts to acquire dual-use technology
and materials with nuclear applications. Iraq's known holdings
of processed uranium are under IAEA supervision. But there is
intelligence that Iraq has sought the supply of significant quantities
of uranium from Africa. Iraq has no active civil nuclear power
programme or nuclear power plants and therefore has no legitimate
reason to acquire uranium.
Iraq's
civil nuclear programme
- Iraq's long-standing civil nuclear power programme is
limited to small scale research. Activities that could be
used for military purposes are prohibited by UNSCR 687 and
715.
- Iraq has no nuclear power plants and therefore no requirement
for uranium as fuel.
- Iraq has a number of nuclear research programmes in the
fields of agriculture, biology, chemistry, materials and
pharmaceuticals. None of these activities requires more
than tiny amounts of uranium which Iraq could supply from
its own resources.
- Iraq's research reactors are non-operational; two were
bombed and one was never completed.
|
-
Intelligence shows that other important procurement
activity since 1998 has included attempts to purchase:
-
vacuum pumps which could be used
to create and maintain pressures in a gas centrifuge cascade needed
to enrich uranium;
-
an entire magnet production line
of the correct specification for use in the motors and top bearings
of gas centrifuges. It appears that Iraq is attempting to acquire
a capability to produce them on its own rather than rely on foreign
procurement;
-
Anhydrous Hydrogen Fluoride (AHF) and fluorine
gas. AHF is commonly used in the petrochemical industry and Iraq
frequently imports significant amounts, but it is also used in
the process of converting uranium into uranium hexafluoride for
use in gas centrifuge cascades;
- one large filament winding machine which could be used to
manufacture carbon fibre gas centrifuge rotors;
- a large balancing machine which could be used in initial centrifuge
balancing work.
-
Iraq has also made repeated attempts covertly to acquire a
very large quantity (60,000 or more) of specialised aluminium
tubes. The specialised aluminium in question is subject to international
export controls because of its potential application in the construction
of gas centrifuges used to enrich uranium, although there is no
definitive intelligence that it is destined for a nuclear programme.
Nuclear
weapons: timelines
-
In early 2002, the JIC assessed that UN sanctions on Iraq were
hindering the import of crucial goods for the production of fissile
material. The JIC judged that while sanctions remain effective
Iraq would not be able to produce a nuclear weapon. If they were
removed or prove ineffective, it would take Iraq at least five
years to produce sufficient fissile material for a weapon indigenously.
However, we know that Iraq retains expertise and design data relating
to nuclear weapons. We therefore judge that if Iraq obtained fissile
material and other essential components from foreign sources the
timeline for production of a nuclear weapon would be shortened
and Iraq could produce a nuclear weapon in between one and two
years.
BALLISTIC
MISSILES
Joint
Intelligence Committee
(JIC) Assessment: 19992002
.
-
In mid-2001 the JIC drew attention
to what it described as a "step-change"
in progress on the Iraqi missile programme
over the previous two years. It was
clear from intelligence that the range
of Iraqi missiles which was permitted
by the UN and supposedly limited to
150kms was being extended and that
work was under way on larger engines
for longer-range missiles.
-
In early 2002 the JIC concluded
that Iraq had begun to develop missiles
with a range of over 1,000kms. The
JIC assessed that if sanctions remained
effective the Iraqis would not be
able to produce such a missile before
2007. Sanctions and the earlier work
of the inspectors had caused significant
problems for Iraqi missile development.
In the previous six months Iraqi foreign
procurement efforts for the missile
programme had been bolder. The JIC
also assessed that Iraq retained up
to 20 al-Hussein missiles from before
the Gulf War.
The
Iraqi ballistic missile programme
since 1998
-
Since the Gulf War, Iraq
has been openly developing two short-range
missiles up to a range of 150km, which
are permitted under UN Security Council
Resolution 687. The al-Samoud liquid
propellant missile has been extensively
tested and is being deployed to military
units. Intelligence indicates that
at least 50 have been produced. Intelligence
also indicates that Iraq has worked
on extending its range to at least
200km in breach of UN Security Resolution
687. Production of the solid propellant
Ababil-100 (Figure 4) is also underway,
probably as an unguided rocket at
this stage. There are also plans to
extend its range to at least 200km.
Compared to liquid propellant missiles,
those powered by solid propellant
offer greater ease of storage, handling
and mobility. They are also quicker
to take into and out of action and
can stay at a high state of readiness
for longer periods.
FIGURE 4: ABABIL-100
-
According to intelligence,
Iraq has retained up to 20 al-Hussein
missiles (Figure 5), in breach of
UN Security Council Resolution 687.
These missiles were either hidden
from the UN as complete systems, or
re-assembled using illegally retained
engines and other components. We judge
that the engineering expertise available
would allow these missiles to be maintained
effectively, although the fact that
at least some require re-assembly
makes it difficult to judge exactly
how many could be available for use.
They could be used with conventional,
chemical or biological warheads and,
with a range of up to 650km, are capable
of reaching a number of countries
in the region including Cyprus, Turkey,
Saudi Arabia, Iran and Israel.
FIGURE 5: AL-HUSSEIN
-
Intelligence has confirmed that
Iraq wants to extend the range of
its missile systems to over 1000km,
enabling it to threaten other regional
neighbours. This work began in 1998,
although efforts to regenerate the
long-range ballistic missile programme
probably began in 1995. Iraq's missile
programmes employ hundreds of people.
Satellite imagery (Figure 6) has shown
a new engine test stand being constructed
(A), which is larger than the current
one used for al- Samoud (B), and that
formerly used for testing SCUD engines
(C) which was dismantled under UNSCOM
supervision. This new stand will be
capable of testing engines for medium
range ballistic missiles (MRBMs) with
ranges over 1000km, which are not
permitted under UN Security Council
Resolution 687. Such a facility would
not be needed for systems that fall
within the UN permitted range of 150km.
The Iraqis have recently taken measures
to conceal activities at this site.
Iraq is also working to obtain
improved guidance technology to increase
missile accuracy.
FIGURE 6: AL-RAFAH/SHAHIYAT LIQUID PROPELLANT ENGINE STATIC TEST STAND
-
The success of UN restrictions
means the development of new longer-range
missiles is likely to be a slow process.
These restrictions impact particularly
on the:
-
availability of foreign expertise;
-
conduct of test flights to ranges
above 150km;
-
acquisition of guidance and control
technology.
-
Saddam remains committed to developing longer-range missiles.
Even if sanctions remain effective, Iraq might achieve a missile
capability of over 1000km within 5 years (Figure 7 shows the range
of Iraq's various missiles).
-
Iraq has managed to rebuild much of the missile production
infrastructure destroyed in the Gulf War and in Operation Desert
Fox in 1998 (see Part 2). New missile-related infrastructure is
also under construction. Some aspects of this, including rocket
propellant mixing and casting facilities at the al-Mamoun Plant,
appear to replicate those linked to the prohibited Badr-2000 programme
(with a planned range of 7001000km) which were destroyed
in the Gulf War or dismantled by UNSCOM. A new plant at al-Mamoun
for indigenously producing ammonium perchlorate, which is a key
ingredient in the production of solid propellant rocket motors,
has also been constructed. This has been provided illicitly by
NEC Engineers Private Limited, an Indian chemical engineering
firm with extensive links in Iraq, including to other suspect
facilities such as the Fallujah 2 chlorine plant. After an extensive
investigation, the Indian authorities have recently suspended
its export licence, although other individuals and companies are
still illicitly procuring for Iraq.
-
Despite a UN embargo, Iraq has also made concerted efforts
to acquire additional production technology, including machine
tools and raw materials, in breach of UN Security Council Resolution
1051. The embargo has succeeded in blocking many of these attempts,
such as requests to buy magnesium powder and ammonium chloride.
But we know from intelligence that some items have found their
way to the Iraqi ballistic missile programme. More will inevitably
continue to do so. Intelligence makes it clear that Iraqi procurement
agents and front companies in third countries are seeking illicitly
to acquire propellant chemicals for Iraq's ballistic missiles.
This includes production level quantities of near complete sets
of solid propellant rocket motor ingredients such as aluminium
powder, ammonium perchlorate and hydroxyl terminated polybutadiene.
There have also been attempts to acquire large quantities of liquid
propellant chemicals such as Unsymmetrical Dimethylhydrazine (UDMH)
and diethylenetriamene. We judge these are intended to support
production and deployment of the al-Samoud and development of
longer-range systems.
FIGURE 7: CURRENT AND PLANNED/POTENTIAL BALLISTIC MISSILES
FUNDING FOR THE WMD PROGRAMME
- The UN has sought to restrict Iraq's ability to generate
funds for its chemical, biological and other military programmes.
For example, Iraq earns money legally under the UN Oil For Food
Programme (OFF) established by UNSCR 986, whereby the proceeds
of oil sold through the UN are used to buy humanitarian supplies
for Iraq. This money remains under UN control and cannot be
used for military procurement. However, the Iraqi regime continues
to generate income outside UN control either in the form of
hard currency or barter goods (which in turn means existing
Iraqi funds are freed up to be spent on other things).
UN Sanctions
UN sanctions on Iraq prohibit all imports to and exports from
Iraq. The UN must clear any goods entering or leaving. The UN
also administers the Oil for Food (OFF) programme. Any imports
entering Iraq under the OFF programme are checked against the
Goods Review List for potential military or weapons of mass
destruction utility. |
-
These illicit earnings go to the Iraqi regime. They are
used for building new palaces, as well as purchasing luxury goods
and other civilian goods outside the OFF programme. Some of these
funds are also used by Saddam Hussein to maintain his armed forces,
and to develop or acquire military equipment, including for chemical,
biological, nuclear and ballistic missile programmes. We do not
know what proportion of these funds is used in this way. But we
have seen no evidence that Iraqi attempts to develop its weapons
of mass destruction and its ballistic missile programme, for example
through covert procurement of equipment from abroad, has been
inhibited in any way by lack of funds. The steady increase over
the last three years in the availability of funds will enable
Saddam to progress the programmes faster.
| Iraq's
illicit earnings |
| Year |
Amount
in $billions |
| 1999 |
0.8 to 1 |
| 2000 |
1.5 to 2 |
| 2001 |
3 |
| 2002 |
3 (estimate) |
|
|
|
|