Home
improvements at the Information Commissioner’s
Office During the year we undertook
a comprehensive review of our corporate objectives and operational
structure. Our ‘Home
Improvement Project’ (HIP) was based on wide staff
participation and is intended to determine how we should
be organised in order to carry out our increased statutory
responsibilities in the most effective way. A number of HIP
task forces were formed to consider issues ranging from the
establishment of our core values to a review of our approach
to enforcement and complaints handling. The work of these
task forces is reflected in our Corporate Plan for 2004-2007.
Our challenge in the coming year is put in place a revised
organisational structure and improved procedures that will
best enable us to meet our responsibilities.
Home
improvement: our objectives
become more proactive and maximise our
influence, targeting issues and cases where detriment
is greatest and where we are especially well-placed
to make a real impact;
be more customer-focused and
better at communicating with target audiences and
working with other organisations;
shift attention
away from those complaints where we cannot provide
remedies in favour of activities which promote good
practice;
transform our internal working methods,
especially to enable us to demonstrate success;
ensure
a reputation for helpfulness and effectiveness;
get
the best from all those working here; and
make the
most of new technology and our regional offices.
Revisions to our corporate governance arrangements also took
place during the year. Four non-executive members were appointed
to our Management Board. We are already benefiting from the
depth of their knowledge and the breadth of their expertise.
Other revisions to our corporate governance arrangements
include new support arrangements for our senior staff, the
re-constitution of the audit committee and improvements to
our risk management procedures.
The increasing demands on
our office for advice about privacy and access issues have necessitated various
improvements
in our service delivery. Our Office runs a helpline which
offers free advice on any aspect of data protection or
freedom of information compliance. Feedback from the many
that use
our helpline is generally good. We are aware though that
some callers were finding it very difficult to get through.
Therefore in November we introduced new telephone software
which has led to more efficient call distribution. The
software enables us to monitor the number of calls we are
taking and
those that do not get through. This confirmed that we were
unable to answer a considerable number of calls. We have
tried therefore to ensure that more telephone lines are
open. Despite staffing constraints we are now answering a
significantly
larger number of calls. During the period April to November
2003 the average number of calls answered per month was
5098, with a high of 5902. During the period December 2003
to March
2004 the average number of calls answered per month was
6630 with a high of 7674.
Job
offer withdrawn
The complainant successfully applied for a job with a
local authority. However the local authority received
a reference from her former employer and the job offer
was withdrawn two days before the complainant was meant
to start her new job. By this time the complainant had
already resigned from her former position. The local
authority refused to provide the complainant with a copy
of the reference on the grounds that it was subject to
a duty of confidence. The complainant was understandably
concerned that if she continued to provide her former
employer as a referee, which she would need to do, this
would continue to have a detrimental effect on her chances
of getting a new job.
The local authority confirmed to
us that the job offer was withdrawn because of the
reference. The authority
explained that it had a policy of giving access to references
unless those giving the reference objected to this. In
this case the reference had been marked ‘confidential’ and
so it was withheld from the complainant.
We decided to
serve the local authority with a preliminary enforcement
notice, requiring the authority to give access to the
reference. We took this course of action because the
information in the reference had already had a seriously
adverse effect on the complainant and would probably
continue to have such an effect.
The former employer
didn’t provide any compelling reason for not
disclosing the reference, and eventually a copy of
the reference
was provided. The Local Authority also said it would
amend the guidance it gives to referees in order to
encourage a more open approach in the future.
Last year we reported on activities
taking place in connection with the modernising government
programme. A new ICT infrastructure
was rolled out in March 2003. This will support our key
business processes and will help us meet targets related
to electronic
records management and electronic service delivery. A new
electronic case handling system with integrated records
management has been rolled out to teams handling enquiries,
data protection
casework and freedom of information publication schemes.
New cases are scanned, classified, routed electronically
and tracked through the case life-cycle. The benefits of
the new application are:
increased productivity through better casework
handling, correspondence tracking and more effective distribution
of workload;
better analysis of our casework, allowing us to target
our guidance more effectively;
more effective use of our
resources; and
the ability to pass work quickly to individuals,
teams and, when fully rolled out, to our regional offices.
Setting
up in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland
The Assistant Commissioners
for our regional offices have now been in post for more than
a year. Having completed
their initial training in our main office, the Assistant
Commissioners
have now moved to offices in Edinburgh, Cardiff and
Belfast. The Scottish Regional Office is settled in permanent
accommodation in Thistle Street, Edinburgh.
The Welsh and Northern Ireland
regional offices are currently in temporary accommodation but the search
for permanent
accommodation is underway. Staff from Wilmslow and
from the Welsh Assembly
have been seconded to help establish the regional
offices. It is hoped that over the next year recruitment
for
permanent staff will commence. However, the regional offices have
already been very active in carrying out promotional
activities in
the areas of data protection and freedom of information.
The situation in Scotland
is somewhat complicated because freedom of information is
a devolved matter,
with Scotland
having its own Freedom of Information Act and Scottish
Information Commissioner. This can be confusing,
and we have done a great
deal of promotional work to deal with this problem.
For example, our Assistant Commissioner explained
the data
protection – freedom
of information interface to an audience of over 500
people at a conference in Edinburgh. The interest
in this area was
such that the conference had to be repeated in early
2004 to cater for those who had been unable to attend
the first
event. Robert Turnbull, the Assistant Commissioner
for Scotland, has said that ‘the move by the
Commissioner to open an office in Scotland has been
very warmly welcomed
across
all sectors especially local government and the Scottish
Executive. It shows that the Commissioner has responded
positively to the devolution settlement and demonstrates
his commitment
to providing a local service tailored to local needs.’
Since
our Cardiff office opened in November last year,
Anne Jones, the Assistant Commissioner for
Wales, has
been developing
contacts and building relationships with local public
authorities and other interested parties, mainly
through speaking engagements
and other meetings. ‘Issues of Welsh language,
politics and geography are now starting to add local
flavour to the
office, with a Welsh language scheme currently in
draft form, an audit underway of key guidance for
possible translation
and plenty of travel to meeting venues accessible
to both north and south Walians,’ said Anne.
With more staff in place, the coming year should
see the Office's
profile
raised considerably, in terms of awareness workshops,
a freedom of information conference and greater publicity
about the
Office's existence.
Although the Northern Ireland
Regional Office deals with both data protection and
freedom of information,
Marie
Anderson, the Assistant Commissioner for Northern
Ireland, has discovered
that this year her work has mainly focused on promoting
freedom of information. According to Marie, ‘public
authorities in Northern Ireland are keen to be ready
for the January
2005 deadline. There is enormous interest in freedom
of information here in Northern Ireland.’ In
January of this year a major freedom of information
conference was held in the
Stormont Hotel in Belfast. Speakers included the
Information Commissioner, Maurice Frankel of the
Campaign for Freedom
of Information and Mrs Emily O’Reilly, the
Irish Information Commissioner. The conference was
an opportunity
to launch
our Belfast office. It was a great success and brought
together 240 delegates from across the public sector
in Northern Ireland.
Marketing and communicating:
increased understanding, greater professionalism.
This year we have again increased
our investment in supporting the public media. We recruited
Citigate
Communications
to provide us with a full press office service
and to support us in undertaking more proactive
work.
Early
in the year
we also developed a new media relations policy,
which sets out our approach to dealing with the
media.
This was timely
given that this year there has been a substantial
increase in the volume of media enquiries and coverage
of privacy
and access to information issues. In particular,
interest in the Freedom of Information Act grows
as full implementation
approaches. Clearly the journalistic community
is interested in the increased access to official
information
that
the Act will bring. As reported elsewhere in this
Report, events
like Soham led to a great deal of negative publicity
coming our way. We have since launched a number
of proactive
media
campaigns to challenge the myths and misunderstandings
surrounding
the legislation. This is part of a wider initiative
to demystify the law we are responsible for enforcing.
We have undertaken a range
of research projects this year, intended to develop our understanding
of the
needs of those
we serve. These have included the following:
annual tracking studies conducted to identify
key patterns and trends in awareness of rights and obligations
amongst
the public, record holders and public authorities;
a
segmentation study, conducted to identify how individuals
can be grouped and thus targeted with messages
relating to their attitudes towards personal information, its use and
potential abuse;
an advertising tracking study
aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of our national advertising
campaign;
a survey to identify how prepared public authorities
are for the introduction of freedom of information
access rights; and
a qualitative study conducted amongst record holders
on their attitudes to the legislation, the business benefits
it provides and the services we offer to assist them.
We have also introduced
a number of monitoring mechanisms to evaluate the performance of the services
we offer.
These include a website feedback facility, website visitor monitoring
statistics and a publications feedback slip. We
have also invested in a much improved website. This supports
an e-mail
alert when new content is posted, is easier for
the public to navigate and generally has a more colourful
and user-friendly
appearance. We expect to make further improvements
to the website in the near future.